Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
The world is changing, people are moving from the country to the cities in search of better job opportunities and a better life. Our cities are getting bigger because of the large amount of new citizens flowing into them. The demand for transportation is going to increase in our towns and cities. I believe that in twenty years time there will be more cars than there are today.
To start with, the number of cars will increase due to the migration of people from the country to the cities. The increasing concentration of people in our cities creates needs for quality forms of transportation. Public transport is good, but what people really desired is the comfortable and privacy that a car can provide. Take, for example, the American way of life, in all American large cities exist meaningful and efficient ways of public commute. Nevertheless, the system of public transportation has not really being developed to its fullness, due to the fact, that cars are easily available and affordable. In addition, cars are also fast and sometimes even cheaper than using public transport.
Moreover, cars companies are not going to stop making profits from their sales. It is a huge business car selling. The system will collapse if the dealing of cars were to decrease. Car companies are adapting. For example, global warming is creating new challenges and in order not to lose earnings the car companies are turning green to keep up the sales of cars now and in the forthcoming future. Furthermore, If a person has the means, and wants to be sympathetic to the environment, then he will buy your new technology car. What will happen with the old car? You will have to sell it, it will become one more car into the streets of the city.
To conclude, cars are here to stay, because we love them. We love the privacy and autonomy that they give us
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | thonsapon83 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | TEJAS PATIL | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | Luis Cortes | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | fofty | 70 | view |
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing TaskThe United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can the from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, throug 3
- Sometimes it is better to be dishonest 73
- It is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specifc subject. 3
- Only people who earn a lot of money are successful. 3
- Smart cars 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, then, for example, in addition, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74844720497 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63448506436 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531055900621 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2818361995 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.45 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199075324399 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661676451234 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717431408219 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103532641169 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053377420715 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.