Go green, there is no planet B. If we cannot protect our environment, our existance will be under the threat. Some individuals opine that we should manage ourselves to the polluted environment rather that taking a step to protect it. I, however, tend to disagree with this notion. In this essay, I will highlight my viewpoints and try to provide sound reasoning for my claims.
There are multifarious benefits of protecting the climate. First and foremost, we can control many health hassles which is causing due to a bad climate. In other words, while there is an imporvement of our surroundings, the ubiquitous probles of health such as asthema, high blood pressue tend to decrease. Additionally, we can make make our world more suitable for our next generation. For instance, the clear environment not only mitigate current ailments, but also encourage the good health of our next generation. Hence, it is important to protect our climate not only for us, but also for our children.
Secondly, we must find the solution to prevent the climate instead of living in it because it will be a temporary solution. To be precise, we should try to eliminate the changed surroundings which is called global warming in the first place. When we try to adjust with the enviromnment, the climate degrade even further. Therefore, we must not live with the changes instead we have to prevent it because it will be the permanent solution.
Finally, protecting the environment is not a rocket science. In other words, we can imporove our climate with individual effort as well as with government's effort and it does not demand any difficult pathway. Even though, the climate change seems inevitable, if elected officials take an initiative such as imposing green tax or supervise industrial's waste product, it become easy to reverse the changed climate. Moreover, when individual understand the importance of recycling of any product, it is not difficult to create a beter world. Thus, we should try to change the world in a better way.
To conclude, I would like to reiterate my viewpoints by saying that, with the help of collaboration among governments and individuals, we can protect our surroundings form degradation. In addition, we must follow the path of self efforts rather than being accastomed.
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 56
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period. 67
- Some organization believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 78
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan. 67
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals; during festival periods, peoplenowadays only want to enjoy themselves. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Give reasons for your answer and include any 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: make
... tend to decrease. Additionally, we can make make our world more suitable for our next ge...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 370, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
Suggestion: becomes
...supervise industrials waste product, it become easy to reverse the changed climate. Mo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, in other words, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06315789474 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90092162259 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531578947368 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 5.43587174349 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9566377557 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4545454545 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.68181818182 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176845829059 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546729606199 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628391380765 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100784705195 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665259436843 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.