The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to the England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates the proportion of visitors to England who went to four different tourist attractions in Brighton over the course of 30 years starting in 1980.
Overall, it is clear that percentage visiting the Pier and the Pavilion increased, while the figure of other attractions fell over the period.
The amount of visitors went to Pavilion was only 10% in 1980. This figure rose steadily to almost 50% from 1980 to 1995 before falling to about 30% in 2010. The similar trend was witnessed in the percentage visiting the Brighton Pier, which increased from about 12% in 1980 to 22% in 2010.
The most popular Brighton attraction in 1980 was the Festival, at about 30%. This figure fell marginally to 28% by 2010. In 1980, 21% of tourists to England went to Art Gallery. This figure rose sharply to a peak of 38%, then decreased violently to lower 10% by 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-20 | canconmuoi | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | canconmuoi | 61 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph shows the number of visitors for three different areas in the European country between 1987 to 2007. 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to the England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 737.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81699346405 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51553335687 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562091503268 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 200.7 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7906428389 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8888888889 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159598169125 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683971425702 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840691562471 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121192383437 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915720820304 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.