The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table represents the percentage of students dealing with seven educational problems in two primary schools in the years 2005 and 2015.
Overall, it is evident that the total percentage of students facing these problems in School A is much higher than the figures for School B. However, School A saw its figures drop between the two years, whereas figures for School B rose slightly.
Looking at the table more closely, one can see that the proportion of students in School A that experience difficulties concentrating in class or following instructions dropped the most dramatically, from 40% and 43% respectively in 2005 to just 18% for both in 2015. The majority of the remaining problems also witnessed a decrease in their figures. By contrast, the proportion of students struggling with their handwriting remained at 28% for both years, whereas the percentage for reading problems rose slightly, from 22% to 23%.
As for School B, with figures of around 15%, putting ideas into words and concentrating during lessons were the two most prevalent problems in both years. The proportion of students struggling with spelling and following instructions both doubled, from 5% to 10% and from 6% to 12% respectively. The percentages of students suffering from reading or listening comprehension problems both rose by 1 percentage point, and the numbers for handwriting issues remained constant for both years.
- The graph shows the percentage of UK adolescents following a vegetarian diet. 89
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 73
- The table below gives information about the amount of beef exported in five different countries in 2012 2014 and 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30973451327 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98079056318 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517699115044 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7238955547 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.333333333 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128353233044 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714134985098 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638507944009 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11439422068 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685291109626 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.