The diagram below shows the number of marriages in the UK between 1951 and 2001. The data given is for all marriages, remarriages and first marriages. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
On the line graph of the depicts the number of marriages in the UK from 1951 to 200 or 2001.it to go to the data for all marriages, remarriages and first marriages.
Initially, in 1951 the tally of all marriages was almost 450 thousands whereas 380 thousands was for first marriages. At the same time the data keep rising till 1981. Also reached to its zenith point, which was 450 thousands and roughly 420 thousands respectively. Apart from this, a gradual decline was seen after 1981 to 2001, which was recorded as the data in the beginning. Furthermore, the data for remarriages was reported with roughly 100 thousands in 1951. It keeps fluctuating around 100 thousands for next six consecutive years, which was 100 thousands in 2001.
Overall, there was a similar trend in the count of all marriages and first marriages. Also, the data of all three was reached to its peak in the same year.
- The diagram below shows the number of marriages in the UK between 1951 and 2001 The data given is for all marriages remarriages and first marriages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people think that the range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...me time the data keep rising till 1981. Also reached to its zenith point, which was ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, so, whereas, apart from, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 748.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76433121019 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62727851536 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535031847134 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 201.6 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9687217753 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1111111111 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243634432231 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124828507318 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1177565518 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232727894522 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120092580667 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.