Some employers believe that they can make their employees work harder by offering incentives. Some others regard strict rules and punishments as a good way to ensure working efficiency.
Discuss both view and give your opinion.
In contemporary society, the employee effectiveness in working is concerned as topical debate which never fails to draw attention. Whilst some companies concur to the belief that inducements can motivate workers to complete the tasks, some opponents support to the statement that rules and disciplines provide a serious working environment. Two aspects of the argument will be analyzed below with supporting and contrasting points.
On the one hand, it is inevitable that the incentives provide not only higher salary but also mental benefits, which are reconized as the happiness for the servants. In additional, the remuneration is a stable source of income, and the insurance is considered as a health care guarantor. Nevertheless, the comfortable working atmospher can become the two-sided knife. The circumstance is that the enjoyable occupation can lead that worker to be less effective, since only the hard-working members achieve the stimulus, whether the lower efficient people are not being punished.
On the other hand, it is stated that regulations and punishments are the strict way to shape the development process of the organization in a framework. The working scheme and progress can be guaranteed due to the force of compulsion. For instance, not being punctual is punished by reducing the salary or criticizing. However, the pressure from the penalties can lead to stress and mental breakdown, which will cause serious consequences. Moreover, the heavy and mandatory workloads restrict employees to the discovery of outside world, as they do not receive any blank in their schedule.
To summarize, it is vital to combine the two ways, which is to provoke with manifold inducements, yet to produce the obligatory rules to ensure the career performance, so as to adapt and reorganize the corporations for the longstanding development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-23 | hunghue1992 | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...rules to ensure the career performance, so as to adapt and reorganize the corporations f...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, as to, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43944636678 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12553871029 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595155709343 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.497844419 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.923076923 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19690315307 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602636969868 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499026569149 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104652905747 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05216252757 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.