people communicate with each other less than in the past because of the popularity of television.
In these modern days, people are willing to some entertainment which keeps them far from other people specifically their families or friends. This a controversial subject that people have more communication with each other in the past than now and that is because of the television. In my opinion, television has a considerable effect on people’s connections. In the following paragraphs, I will explore into the most conspicuous reasons and examples justifying my viewpoint.
To begin with, people, now, have not lots of time to gather and they spend their time with the television. Most individuals have a permanent job that they are busy with lots of work in a day. Furthermore, when they return to their house they need to relax and watching some attractive programs on the television. So, people are inclined to use that break time at the night to watch their most interesting programs on the television. For example, my father works from 8 in the morning until 5 in the evening. When he comes back home, he prefers to watch channels that are related to the news to find out what happened on that special day in the country. He does not like to spend his time with others because he is tired. As a result, the television is a good thing to enjoy your time with it instead of being with others.
Secondly, people sometimes are connected to each other to use other’s suggestions on their issues, but after the invention of the television, they have recognized that it can help us in their problems much better than other people’s advice. Individuals have so many problems in their lives which they need to solve them, immediately. Make a date with families or friends at this time of the developmental moment in the cities that are so chaotic is impossible. With traffic congestion in the cities, people have to make an appointment in the nearest place to them. Consequently, they prone to watch television and use their offers to pass their problems.
In conclusion, with the advent of the television, people do not connect like the past. This is because individuals do not have much time in a day and their preference to solve the problems is using technologies like television or applications in their phones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | f.jafary66@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Bashir Ahmad Faizi | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Bashir Ahmad Faizi | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | BearTien | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | BearTien | 76 | view |
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 1. Interrupt and correct the mistake right away; 2. Wait until the class or the 70
- TPO 53 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and examples t 73
- European silver coins which found on the site in state Maine. 73
- TPO 45 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87139107612 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89318622263 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49343832021 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2602039759 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6842105263 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0526315789 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297144670161 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100944529481 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128109589621 0.0737576698707 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204997936229 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077584169923 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.