Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of societies and environment.
Currently, most of our world’s countries adopt Capitalism fiscal ideology. This means that governments have handed over some responsibilities to firms and companies. So, corporations are not only required to operate within the law, but also are responsible for related communities and environments, where they work inside its sphere and directly influenced with any slight changes, that occur to these factors.
Societies consist of people, venues and infrastructure. These are assets of any corporation, which is willing to achieve greater profit. Thus, communities are assets of corporations, that need continuous development in order to support corporations to expand and increase its revenues.
For instance, an enterprise that have thousands of employees can be promptly affected with the status of either its employees or the environment that surrounds them. As long as the employees are performing well, the company will have better overall results and vice versa. Considering employees as an asset is a deciding factor to the success of any entity. These employees are humans, so they live in communities, that have effects on their performance at work.
It is obvious, that any company aims at maximizing its income as much as possible, despite any obstacle it faces, it must maintain its success and revenues. Nevertheless, general community development programs may not have a positive impact on its employees, even it can worsen their situation and backfires on the firm itself.
A healthy environment, satisfying communities’ needs and developing infrastructure ensures the well-being of corporations themselves. Because these factors determine the performance of employees in any firm, companies shall consider only the needs of their capitals and the prospects of its development through improving societies and environment,
A careful study of the needs of employees must be researched before taking any action. For example, a lack of transports that make them suffer everyday reaching their destinations, poor infrastructure such as roads which delay delivery of the companies’ product or even a spread rumors or stereotypes that might in any way affect the company’s policy of retaining its success. Another instance is a company that sells food and beverages in a community that follows old school’s traditions in nutrition, promoting campaigns for healthy food, that the company produces, can be decisive to its sales.
It is more like win-win deal in favor of both parties, not only communities are developing but also corporations benefit from such processes.
All in all, companies should not under any circumstances pursue any other goal than increasing its revenues and gaining as much profit as possible, even though they must invest in their employees by enhancing the communities, where they live, including environment, because they are considered as their capital.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-24 | Moustafa Nofale | 73 | view |
- Question authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world. 50
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of societies and environment. 73
- Being a celebrity-such as a famous film star or sports personality- brings problems as well as benefits. do you think being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems? 84
- Question authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world. 50
- Question authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 48.0 24.0651302605 199% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2493.0 1615.20841683 154% => OK
No of words: 444.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61486486486 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20941678492 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558558558559 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 767.7 506.74238477 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.0676604311 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158126044572 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553913761741 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552995055261 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0721771687555 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496307512421 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.