Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays. Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages?
In today's competitive world, employers prefer to keep in touch with the workforce every time regardless of their vacation period. Whilst this development has some positives for the organization, it has more negative impacts on employees, which cannot be overlooked.
Admittedly, there are two potential advantages of maintaining a connection with workers during their off-time. First and foremost, during an emergency, an employer can contact their assistants to fix the situations. As the employee is a valuable asset for a firm, their overtime work can sometimes combat with the downfalls of the company, which consequently increases its productivity. The nurses of medical institutions, for instance, are contacted for urgent operations at a hospital, to aid the patient with the help of doctors, even in their holidays. This would eventually improve the ratings of hospitals, owing to their hardworking staff. Moreover, this connection tends to strengthen the employee-employer relationship. More conversation about work-related issues can not only develop understanding among themselves but also boost the retention of an employee in the company. Thus, the benefits of the afore-mentioned practice cannot be neglected.
Despite the advantages, there are some disadvantages of calling employees during their holiday. Firstly, it is the breaching of their privacy, if they are pressurized to work even at home. In other words, they cannot balance their work-life and personal life appropriately, due to the work-related responsibilities after the regular working hours. Secondly, the continuous stress of the workplace given by their boss will decrease their efficiency as well as health, which ultimately leads to poor performance. The employees of multinational companies are more prone to Insomnia, as they have to work over-time because of the company demands, according to the article published in The Lancet. Finally, the workers are unable to build fruitful relations with their family and loved ones, that will subsequently devastate their life. Hence, the given factors are not proved to be beneficial for employees.
In conclusion, although the connectivity of employers with their workforce even in breaks has some pros for the businesses, yet after analysis, the disadvantages of this practice to the employees, outshine as compare to its advantages. Therefore, workers must finish their work at the workplace instead of taking it home and should give equal importance to their personal life.
- You have a Facebook friend living in another country and s he is curious to learn about a major news item in your country Write a letter to your Facebook friend In your letter describe a news story in your country explain why people are interested in it s 89
- The internet contains a lot of information however sometimes this information is inaccurate or wrong Do you agree or disagree with the statement 87
- You are going to another country to study You would like to do a part time job while you were studying so you want to ask a friend who lives there for some help 73
- You are not satisfied with your recent trip Write a letter to the travel agency In your letter Where and when you went on holiday What has happened What do you want from the organization 74
- Some people think that the government is responsible for the rise in obesity in children while others think it is the fault of the parents Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68865435356 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20463294436 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572559366755 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4056390961 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.473684211 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9473684211 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63157894737 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265393721898 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817296983917 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423705609338 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169051414408 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231302245572 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.