Learning a second language is of great importance, which should be taken seriously not only by parents but also by educational apparatus; nevertheless, starting time for learning this vital matter is of cosmetic importance. Starting to learn a foreign language earlier than what is conventional in our education system, would be very beneficial as well as harmful. So, I intend to put this controversial issue into comparative perspective in the following essay.
Firstly, children can learn much easier and faster in their younger age, and it is related to infinite mind capacity in little children in comparison to the older ones. As majority of scientists are unanimous, the younger a person is, the better he can grasp new materials. I have recently read an article about this issue which was investigating about the correlation coefficient between brains associated learning skills and the age. The article clearly concluded that there is an undeniable connection within these two indicators. Although some people believe it could have negative effects as well, because due to their thought, learning two languages at the same time will result in child’s confusion and from there to his language learning process malfunctioning, however, scientists’ researches prove otherwise.
Second benefit is rise from social adoption, that is to say, human beings one of the best periods of cultural acceptance is their earlier part of life, therefore, teaching a new language to a junior student beside his original language, needs an acceptable level of compatibility to have a cultural comprehension of both native and alien languages social features, which a small kid could better manage it rather than older teenage. My own experience is a good case in point. MY mother sends me to English classes when I was only a toddler. I would never soak up the English culture, unless I went to English courses in my younger age. Even though a group of people may take issue with this and encounter the notion by saying that this may cause cultural misunderstanding rather than cultural adaptation, but my own experience reveals just the opposite.
On balance, having compared both merits and demerits of this controversial subject; it is clearly depicted that the advantage of instructing second language in primary school outweigh that of in secondary one by a large margin for two major benefits. One is related to the cerebral potentials at younger age and the other is linked to psychological preparation for intake a new culture though a new language.
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 751, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...and from there to his language learning process malfunctioning, however, scientists&apo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, as well as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 412.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21601941748 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00334729369 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580097087379 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.3176258641 49.4020404114 199% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.266666667 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4666666667 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247178471596 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633377251117 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059620202577 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138134582023 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414597373679 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.