the importance

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atable has now become more controversial more many people claiming that it is ben...
^^
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny people claiming that it is beneficial has while other reject notion. The subs...
^^
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g that it is beneficial has while other reject notion. The substantial influence...
^^
Line 1, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and thus will end to logical conclusion There are myriad of reason which was wil...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... myriad of reason which was will further explain argument but the most prepondera...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...o say merits stand is good stead. However there are some pitfalls that negate the...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 45, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this argument' or 'these arguments'?
Suggestion: this argument; these arguments
...ver there are some pitfalls that negate these argument and which con certainly overwhelm the o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rent why many are against this trend. According to be argument aforementioned...
^^^^
Line 13, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are against this trend. According to be argument aforementioned above one ...
^^
Line 13, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...drawback should not be overlooked either
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 31.9359605911 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 1207.87684729 71% => OK
No of words: 162.0 242.827586207 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3024691358 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.92707691288 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65873878694 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 139.433497537 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635802469136 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 379.143842365 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6551724138 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.6396038569 50.4703680194 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.166666667 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.25397266985 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.33497536946 187% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0472759040373 0.242375264174 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0275657326431 0.0925447433944 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616388520395 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0198246330705 0.151781067708 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343372717196 0.0609392437508 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 55.0591133005 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.