Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
While some people tend to think that scientists or other researchers should focus the area which can benefit the most people in the world, others seem to disagree with it. In my opinion, I believe that scientists and researchers have to study diverse area, and not just an area to benefit the greatest number of people.
To begin with, if nobody studies rare disease or some area which people do not understand, lots of people will have a poor life. To be specific, lots of people have rare disease and they hope scientists to discover the panacea. For example, AIDS is the terrified disease which still have no panacea to eradicate. Lots of people suffered from this disease. If no scientists focus on this issue, this disease will spread for a long time, and more people will get infected. Therefore, Studying the diverse area for scientists is important to benefit people.
The second point is that the object of discovering the new things is not always benefit to people. Lots of different subject need scientists to study. What's more? Discovering the new things is the primary for scientists since lots of problems have not be resolved. For instance, there are lots of garbage from human which polluting marine. Scientists have to study how to resolve this problem. If they just focus on their area, lots of different issues will not be resolved, and society will not advance. Thus, I think scientists should not just focus on one area.
True, some people might say that if scientists and scholars just focus on their research on one area that most people can be benefited, the government would save lots of money on dispensable objects. However, this belief fools to consider the fact that if scientists discover the new things or produce the new way to make the society advanced, the government will save more money than just focusing on one area. Thus, this is hard to convince people of this idea.
To sum up, with the reasons mentioned above, I think scientists and researchers have to study diverse area since rare disease is an important issue for people and we cannot ignore it, and discovering the new things is the purpose of science. There seems to be some validity to other points of view. However, I still believe that the reasons of my opinion are stronger.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | shoeb_athar | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | DH123 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Jianmo | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | Mukul | 50 | view |
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville:"Over the past three years, there has been a marked increase in cases of 'sidewalk rage,' similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road, but instead among sidew 72
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful bacter 40
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books.We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because i 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 152, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...erent subject need scientists to study. Whats more? Discovering the new things is the...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 253, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...entists since lots of problems have not be resolved. For instance, there are lots ...
^^
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e reasons of my opinion are stronger.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 394.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84517766497 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44533235754 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.418781725888 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 582.3 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.1216485748 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9047619048 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7619047619 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2380952381 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298741048817 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935635633994 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106584679718 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206483424378 0.150359130593 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14800945756 0.0667264976115 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.