Essay topics: Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In past few decades as a result of industrialization the world has turn into a global market. Some people hold the belief that having local products available across are the globe could have some negative implications. However, I tend to agree with the statement only up-to a some extent.
On the one hand, the reason why I believe the convenience of buying the same products anywhere in the world leads to the first drawback: the reduction in domestic products. It is widely believed that a plenty of inhabitants is a fan of foreign goods, especially the number seems to increase in developing countries. With the likeliness of products sold everywhere in the world, a number of people would choose to support items from developed countries. This course of action would lead to the disappearance of several products. Another reason to disapprove of this trend is the loss of cultural diversity. We cannot deny the fact that clothes are liked to one’s culture. People are likely to ignore these conventional clothes in their own country as they can pursuit imported ones with nominal prices which they believe to have much more quality. Consequently, such development influences our cultural aspects negatively.
On the other hand, products are in close proximity to customers than ever before due to globalization. Having such a feature has multifarious benefits: This trend creates a competitive environment, additionally urges them to push themselves up, in order to revitalize their own brands; New inventions are introduced in market to attract customers. It also increases the selling opportunity for everyone, your commodities as a producer is not restricted to own country; national boundaries dissolve and you become a global retailer. The resulting world would be a one big country with no segregation based on race or border.
In conclusion, I would opine that having same items available across the globe is advantageous. However, few points such as decline of cultural diversity and local brands getting outpaced by multi-national corporations are points worth considering.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | lokeshwari | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | Sonali Guha | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-07 | pooyanfaizian | 89 | view |
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people feel that paparazzi should not follow celebrities and invade their privacy by taking pictures of them everywhere, while others believe this is just the price of fame. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer, and 78
- Film stars and music celebrities may earn a great deal of money and live in luxurious surroundings, but many of them lead unhappy lives.Do you agree? To what extent is this the price they pay for being famous? 84
- Many management interviews are based around assessing not only a person’s level of experience and knowledge but also their personality. 61
- Many people like to wear fashionable clothes Why do you think this is the case Is this a good thing or a bad thing 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'turned'.
Suggestion: turned
...sult of industrialization the world has turn into a global market. Some people hold ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 36, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
... On the other hand, products are in close proximity to customers than ever before due to gl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32732732733 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06296884976 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600600600601 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8670252744 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.352941176 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5882352941 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1814729809 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472351685472 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389510676789 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859976480553 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569356824916 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.