In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In the 21st century, the contemporary media coverage is very intensive and comprehensive. That's why so many incidents in the world have been reported through mass media, such as newspaper, radio, television. It seems logical, regarding to this fact, some argues that any living man or woman cannot be a hero any longer during this period. However, I would like to elaborate my opinion at below that this statement may be in extremely generalized position.
Admittedly, anyone is unlikely to deny the influence of mass media. Clearly, we are not able to remember all the information or news happening now. For example, we may consider a political scandal seriously when the accident is now emerged, however, after some weeks or a month, we may be likely to forget this. The stories about some great citizens who have catched a thief or firefighters who nicely have quenched a huge fire are not also in exception. Surely our humans have a limited capacity in memory, furthermore, our time is so called 'information of flood'. That's why the statement rejecting the possibility of regarding any living man or woman as a hero seems plausible.
Though the intensive coverage of traditional mass media, however, Social media such as Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube have recently grown up in the influence themselves to people. In South Korea, for example, a news about seven heros had been shared by those new media. There was a severe accident of a kindergarten bus under fire in long tunnel in express highway. In the bus, there are about twenty children under age 7, however, the driver is already killed by the accident. In this emergency situation, the passing drivers had stopped their cars and got off to save those children despite of the dangerous circumstance that the bus may be explored soon. Finally, those children had been safely rescued and this touching story have been famous in the country that actually many of my friends yet remember about the news. In summary, the environment of media have now been extremely changed. The consumers of mass media now can choose the information just what they want to see. In this circumstances, anybody can be a famous man or woman, even a hero.
In conclusion, in the lights of the counterparts above, the shown statement may be implausible. In this age, the fact that the media coverage is intensive is true, however, the situation have been changed. Peoples are not a passive consumer at all, in fact they have acted now as a supplier of information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | joonho | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Caveira meyona | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | Xion5 | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Serin Jeon | 50 | view |
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 66
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for th 66
- In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 50
- In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, b 54
- Essay topics: Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posi 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ge is very intensive and comprehensive. Thats why so many incidents in the world have...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...time is so called information of flood. Thats why the statement rejecting the possibi...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 211, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...to people. In South Korea, for example, a news about seven heros had been shared by th...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 986, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ormation just what they want to see. In this circumstances, anybody can be a famous ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 98, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the shown statement may be implausible. In this age, the fact that the media cover...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, furthermore, however, may, regarding, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2091.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93160377358 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74196514639 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4443227958 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.0454545455 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.59090909091 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16874755988 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536253783356 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633550260178 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11368935412 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037875071286 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.