The charts below give information about the amount spent on different forms of advertising.
The charts show estimated amount of money spent on different advertising mediums and estimated change in the expenditure on these mediums in future.
Despite being the least used form of advertising in 2005, expenditure on internet ads has by far the highest expected growth in 2006. On the contrary, the category of advertising which is expected to have the lowest rise is Radio, followed by Newspapers.
The pie chart illustrates that the three dominant forms of advertising in 2005 were TV, Direct Mail and Newspapers. Estimated expenditure on those advertising categories was just over three times as high as expenditure on Radio, Magazines and Internet combined.
In addition, the bar graph demonstrates that the amount of money spent on all of the advertisers is expected to grow in 2006. However, the predicted growth is, in all cases except internet advertising, not bigger than 10 per cent. Besides the 25 per cent rise of the expenditure on Internet ads, the biggest expected growth has Direct Mail, followed by TV. The rise of expenditure on the other forms of advertising is predicted to be slightly smaller, within the range of 5 and 10 per cent.
- The charts below give information about the amount spent on different forms of advertising 71
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...nge in the expenditure on these mediums in future. Despite being the least used form o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...rates that the amount of money spent on all of the advertisers is expected to grow in 2006...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, in addition, in all cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0725388601 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89272342289 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512953367876 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 13.183416444 43.030603864 31% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124640148524 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560718522984 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055141125519 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849373301049 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537771898798 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.