The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
The graph provides information about the quantity of enquiries that the Tourist Information Office accepted between January and June in 2011.
Overall, the number of enquiries received in person and over the phone experienced the upward trend while the number of enquiries accepted by letter or email showed the downward trend. Even though enquiries made in person initially had the lowest rate, they bottomed out and outraced letter and telephone enquiries over the six month period.
The number of enquiries received in person was just over 400 in January. It gradually increased by March reaching the amount of 800. The figure then experienced a sharp rise and peaked in June with about 1900 enquiries.
The amount of enquiries that were made through the phone device was higher than the other two categories at first and it was around 900. However, after that it fluctuated, hitting the low point of 800 calls in February. The figure then showed a rapid growth reaching its peak with about 1600 enquiries in June.
As far as the questions sent via letter or email are concerned, their number was highest in January and it was just below 800. It slightly dropped in February and March. Then it started dropping more rapidly, reaching the low point of 400 enquiries in May and staying the same in June.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lunanguyen0701 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days. 56
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 67
- The charts below give information about the amount spent on different forms of advertising 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02714932127 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41617095985 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533936651584 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6805816357 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5833333333 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296464228741 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923072733291 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998719184477 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160657094663 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101503032745 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.