Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Education is the key of progress for any nation. Any country that is considered prosperous must have put education as its’ first priority. Countries in south-eastern Asia were able to advance significantly to appear in the world stage due to its huge investments in education. Simply, they weighed the cost of education and ignorance and found that it is cheaper to provide free education for its people. I strongly agree with the suggestion, that free high education is essential, because of the following three reasons:
First of all, free high education is an investment of a capital, which is -in this case- students, who had remarkable talents and skills, that allowed them to be accepted in universities. Governments shall consider this as a process of development of its human resources. For instance, the ongoing advances and inventions in Japan, especially in the software field, can be directly related to its free education policy, which enables students to study advanced sciences and contribute to the progress of the country. As a result, any country would benefit from this plan and absolutely will have a positive impact on its economy, culture and international prestige.
Secondly, a strategy of funding only those, who are in need, guarantees that the government’s budget is spent wisely. Every society has diverse financial categories such as poor, rich and middle class. Facilitating free education for financially prosaic students is an act of justice. A careful study of a student’s fiscal situation and granting scholarships based on that, have a reflect on not only the stability of the government but also the morale of students. The egalitarian distribution of resources among citizens will build up trust and loyalty. Furthermore, students will seek to work hard to reach their required objectives, as they know, that they can equal opportunities to get free high education, regardless of their monetary condition.
Finally, committing free high education for those, who are talented, already got admitted to a university but cannot secure funding, assure that every student is in the proper place. For example, scholars with artistic skills can be encouraged to join the faculties of fine Arts or Architecture and other students who have a passion for science will keep pursuing it. Having every possible resource in the exact position is considered wisdom. Therefore, such countries may become an international destination for education.
All in all, many decision-makers see that free high education is costly and seems to be a burden on any government, they would also likely to invest in facilities such as universities and run it as a business, however the advantages of free high education are countless, only if it is well applied, as it influences the nation culturally, economically and internationally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Dhruv_gre | 54 | view |
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 66
- Several recent studies have shown a link between health and stair usage. One recently completed study shows that people who live in stairs-only apartment buildings (that is, buildings without elevators) live an average of three years longer than do people 55
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Other, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give you 84
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the 16
- the purpose of higher education is to prepare students for the future, but Classen students are at a serious disadvantage in the competition for post-college employment due to the University's burden-some breadth requirements. Classen's job plac 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure and international prestige. Secondly, a strategy of funding only tho...
^^^^
Line 13, column 390, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...anting scholarships based on that, have a reflect on not only the stability of the govern...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2430.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3642384106 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13027240417 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562913907285 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 768.6 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.3321292618 60.3974514979 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.894736842 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8421052632 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.31578947368 5.21951772744 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206803334057 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064234121935 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519230439928 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119784026072 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337729445439 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 100.480337079 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.