tpo 49
Undoubtedly, modern life is very complicated and all human beings want to have a great and happy life. Although our life is ephemeral and transitory, people have a huge attempt to find a way for happiness. This is obvious that human live in social setting and we are human because we live together and we have a lot of interaction with each other. Nevertheless, in my point of view people should have a close group of friends for long time and there is no doubt that this have plenty of benefits for friends.
Trust is a major aspect of our life. The only reason that people can be live with each other is trust. You can just fall in love with some one that you like but the relationship can be over very soon if you do not have trust for each other. Moreover, you can trust someone if you spend long time with him/ her and merely in the specific situations like bad or good you can understand that your friend’s character. Furthermore, a lot of psychological researches investigate the impact of trust on relationships. If you have some close friends that you trust them, you will be very close and this makes your life comfortable and you will find happiness around them. When you need them you know that they will be there for you to help you and to support you.
In spite of what mentioned before, there is no doubt, that making new friends has a lot of profits for us. Even, we cannot find our best friend or friends if we are not able to interact with people very-well. This can be very fun to be friend with lots of people and speak with them about new things. Having new friends can open some doors for us. Some people find their job by some new friends who offer them the job. You never know what will happen if you make new friends in a party, that can be your best chance or the way for your happiness. Social scientists believe that the ability of new friend making is important for our mental health and persons who have lots of friends have better life.
In conclusion, each person based on his values and views is different, I believe that we should have some small close friends who we are trusted and we love for long time as well as having a good ability to making new friends for getting fun and new opportunities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-27 | mmorteza | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | firataydogdu | 70 | view |
| 2021-06-12 | TOEFLpreparation | 70 | view |
| 2020-09-18 | Hamide | 70 | view |
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for univ professors 73
- to have a job where they work only three days a week for long hours or a job where they work five days a week for short hours 60
- technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement After completing high school students should take at least a year off to work or travel before they begin studying at a university Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...s trust. You can just fall in love with some one that you like but the relationship can ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, in conclusion, no doubt, you know, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39088729017 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35379246151 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431654676259 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1901024886 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3684210526 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9473684211 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 58.1214874552 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 10.9000537634 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.61 8.01818996416 82% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.