The diagram shows the process used to carve wooden shoes called clogs. There are 6 main stages, made all by hand so without the use automatic machines.
The first operation is to obtain wood from either poplar or willow trees. The log is cut with a saw into pieces. After this operation, with the use of an axe the piece of wood is cut to a proper size and then outlined in order to roughly form a shoe figure. Then with the help of a knife the piece of wood is defined into the proper shoe shape. Next, with a spoon drill the clogs are being bored out in order to fit the feet. Once this is done sandpaper is used smoothing down the wood on the inside and the outside of the clogs in order to define and finishing them. The final step is to decorate the completed wooden shoes with the use of different colours, although this step is optional. The clogs are now done and ready to be used.
This completes the process of making traditional wooden footwear, or clogs, by hand.
- The diagram illustrates the process of making traditional wooden shoes called clogs 84
- the line chart below shows the results of a survey giving the reasons why people moved to the capital city of a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 48
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- the line chart below shows the results of a survey giving the reasons why people moved to the capital city of a particular country.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.30810810811 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.11305033979 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556756756757 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4402143217 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.4545454545 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243975895363 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941020995418 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120347189943 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206664122776 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779563768073 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 13.2329268293 55% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.42 11.4140731707 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.