It is considered by some that countries should invest more in the construction of new railways lines for fast trains, while there are others who think that it should be better to invest in the improvement of the already existing public transportations. In my opinion, both options are really valid, but I believe that firstly we should have the interest to improve the public transportations we already have and then think about constructing new railways.
On the one hand, many think it is better to spend money in order to have access to fast trains. In other words, being able to travel at high speed can improve surely travel time. This can increase job opportunities because people are more tent to accept works that require traveling. Also, the fact of investing in the construction of new railways create job opportunities itself.
On the other hand, improving the public transportations that the cities already have would make them safer and more efficient. Investing in the public transportation service will create more concessions for the citizens so that more people would be facilitated and would feel more comfortable to use them and consequently this will create less traffic.
In conclusion, both options are really great because they will improve the usage of public transportations reducing like this air pollution, but in my opinion, countries should invest their money thinking in order of scale. Firstly they should begin to spend money to improve the already existing public transportations and then they should start to invest in the improvement of transportation on a bigger scale.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- The diagram illustrates the process of making traditional wooden shoes called clogs 84
- the line chart below shows the results of a survey giving the reasons why people moved to the capital city of a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 48
- The diagram illustrates the process of making traditional wooden shoes called clogs 63
- the line chart below shows the results of a survey giving the reasons why people moved to the capital city of a particular country.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, really, so, then, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1877394636 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9606323683 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 176.041082164 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478927203065 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.5614327319 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.4 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331484193396 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135883603972 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079565559031 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203379410896 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812651822735 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.