The line chart illustrate fuel use in USA from 1980 and an estimate upto 2030.
Overal, petrol and oil is the popular form of energy used and it is projected to continue increasing until 2030, while coal and natural gas was averagely used at the same rate interchangeably, until 2020 were it is estimated that coal will be highly used than natural gas. Three power sources namely, nuclear, solar or wind and hydropower are marginally used and will continue steadily into 2030 as forecasted.
It is noticeable that, petrol and oil is the major source of fuel, at 35 quadrillion units in 1980. The rate was intermittently rising and falling steadily upto 1995, and increased dramatically untill 2015. It is projected to be the major source of fuel by 2030, at 50 quadrillion.
Furthermore, consumption of coal and natural gas was at average, 15 and 20 quadrillion units respectively. The increasing and decreasing rate of these fuel sources was interchangeable until 2015, coal became popular compared to gas at approximately 28 quadrillion units in 2030 as estimated. Gas will have a usage rate of about 25 quadrillion units as it remain constant from 2015 to 2030.
In addition, nuclear, solar or wind and hydropower use reamin marginalised. Beginning 1980, they all had an equal consumption rate of about 4 quadrillion units until 1985. The mostly used fuel among the three was nuclear, it also continued to fluctuate gradually to about 5 quadrillion in 2030, as forecasted. Further, solar or wind and hydropower rose interchangeably upto 2005, when solar or wind was averagely used and will be used at the same rate in 2030. Hydropower will remain constant until 2030, at below 5 quadrillion units as projected
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing.What factors contribute to job satisfaction?How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 56
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods. 67
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...e same rate interchangeably, until 2020 were it is estimated that coal will be highl...
^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at average, 15 and 20 quadrillion units respectively. The increasing and decreas...
^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pectively. The increasing and decreasing rate of these fuel sources was interchan...
^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...estimated. Gas will have a usage rate of about 25 quadrillion units as it remain ...
^^
Line 9, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...The mostly used fuel among the three was nuclear, it also continued to fluctuate ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, so, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 965.302439024 149% => OK
No of words: 286.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03146853147 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01211346435 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465034965035 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 283.868780488 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0035811169 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.785714286 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115248795209 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554901121961 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385375921266 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0815402268235 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230864628432 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.