Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subject that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both view and give

Essay topics:

Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subject that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both view and give your own opinion.

Nowadays, there are contradictory thoughts and believes regarding what students should learn and study at university. One set of people believes that students should not study whatever they desire; while others disagree. From my vantage point, students should have the freedom to study what they are interested in.

There are varies fruitful professions in the field of science and technology that offers fancy perks and prosperous career. According to the above statement, it is thought by many that, rather than studying one subject it is logical to study which could initially lead to a wealthy career and handsome salary. For instance, In my current firm, those who have degrees related to science and technology have eye bugling payrolls and incentives. Overall, there is no doubt that these subjects could potentially be a money-making occupation but other subjects are also valuable.

On the other, some people opine that students are in the title to choose subjects which suit their inclination. Because they believe that those who follow their ability and passion will most likely to have a prosperous future. Moreover, each human beings possess a unique set of innate skills and talents which should be allowed to bloom and find its way into the right path to success. To illustrate, Rolando is the example of a person who followed his talent and became the most famous player in the sports industry. Furthermore, each occupation plays an important and equal role in society such as painters, carpenters and so on.

In conclusion, this essay discussed why students should be free to focus on whatever subject they like rather than concentrating only on the subject which is related to technology and science. From a practical standpoint, freedom of choice should be given to students.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-05 Farhad1010 84 view
2019-12-05 Farhad1010 78 view
2019-12-02 Farhad1010 78 view
Essays by user Farhad1010 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 503, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...nd became the most famous player in the sports industry. Furthermore, each occupation ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, moreover, regarding, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21993127148 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66369799683 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59793814433 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5005668883 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423338914973 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129113171963 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911396374882 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243347939116 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736359921171 0.056905535591 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.