Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects. Others say it causes the loss of national identities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is said that the increased international trading activities and cultural assimilation bring benefits to individual countries. However, others claim that the identity of each nation is put at stake. From my perspective, this phenomenon is predominantly beneficial, dwarfing the drawback it might bring.
Growing international trading between countries leads to economic growth. When countries do business with one another, they can take advantage of their economic strengths. For example, Vietnam can export their staple crop – rice – to countries in the WTO, and import advanced machinery from USA or other developed countries. This benefits the GDP growth of each participant country.
As regards cultural exchange, groups of citizens in a country can join some cultural exchange programmes and take this opportunity to gain a better insight into the other countries’ cultural heritage. Gradually, the bilateral relationship in cultural terms is formed, giving rise to mutual understanding and respect. Tourists of each country when visiting another can avoid cultural misunderstanding and have an enriched cultural experience.
Some people are worried about the loss of cultural and national identity. As their argument goes, in [your country], the youths are increasingly being influenced by the Kpop culture, for instance. They follow the styles of their favorite singers and actors, disregarding the traditional costume and other time-honored traditions. However, this is not always the case regarding other groups in society. With maturity, people would know to discriminate right from wrong, and become impervious to the outside influences.
In conclusion, the benefits of increasing globalization dominate, and I also believe the culture of each country is threatened to only a negligible extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-07 | Farhad1010 | 67 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study a subject that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and g 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study a subject that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and g 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study a subject that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and g 78
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects. Others say it causes the loss of national identities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and gi 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, regarding, so, as regards, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82899628253 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12906056582 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631970260223 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9847317188 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8125 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232958903004 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726682082654 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513685160978 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12082449744 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334921161027 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.