The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000.
The table compares the value of fish imported to the US (measured in billions of dollars) in 1988, 1992, and 2000, while the pie charts illustrate the percentage of fish brought in from China, Canada and other countries in the same period.
Overall, the value of fish imported to the USA increased dramatically over the period given. It is also noticeable that in 1988, Canada was the primary source of fish but other countries overtook in 1992 and 2000.
The total value of fish import in 1988 was at $6.57 billion then rose by around 2% to $8.52 billion in 1992, before increasing to peak at $10.72 billion in 2000.
Canada was the predominant source of fish in 1988 at more than half of the total import but dropped continuously to a low of 28% in 2000. By contrast, China's figure grew steadily from 13% in 1988 to nearly a third in 2000. The percentage of fish supplied by other countries started at 27% in 1988 but went up to less than half to become the main source in 1992 and 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | jenmin | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | farzad.rahmati_1989 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | Szprawstyle | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | Sandhu111 | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | Sidhulakhveer17@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The government should offer free prenatal classes for expecting parents. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graphs below show the total production and sources of electricity in two countries in 1980 and 2000. 67
- Some people believe that the government should make university education free for all Others disagree and say that students should pay for their own education 78
- The chart below shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998 77
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four modes of transport. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47802197802 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34970264584 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494505494505 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0908804378 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.428571429 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370111808614 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1808053344 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074139573465 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240250557279 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586563854623 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.