The graph below gives information about how much people in the United States and the United Kingdom spend on petrol.
The line graph compares the proportion of income spent on petrol by the Americans and British in terms of socioeconomic status.
Overall, as people get wealthier in the USA they spent less on petrol but in the UK it is a reverse trend. It is also noticeable that the poorest Americans spent the most on petrol.
The spending on petrol by the poorest Americans was 4 times bigger than the poorest British, at nearly 4% and about 1% respectively. As the poor Americans' level of income improves their spending on petrol rose to just over 5%, and this figure decreased steadily, in contrast to British wherein their spending grew consistently as they become richer. Despite the difference on trends, both countries spending on petrol was the same as people reached the upper border of middle-income, at almost 4%.
Rich people in both countries spent around 4% on petrol, however, in the USA as they move to the richest category their spending dropped continuously to just over 2%, whereas in the UK it level off, after which it declined to just over 3%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-06 | Nhu Tuyet | 77 | view |
| 2020-04-06 | Nhu Tuyet | 91 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | jenmin | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | nuridayati | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | nuridayati | 67 | view |
- The charts below show the primary purposes for British people leaving their country in 1999 and the amount of those people who left the country for less than a week. 67
- The line graph below shows the number of serious crimes that occurred in London between 2003 and 2012 61
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors- agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services- to the UK economy in the twentieth century. 61
- Modern children are suffering from the diseases that were once considered to be meant for adults only. Obesity is a major disease prevalent among children. What are its causes and what solutions can be offered? 73
- The pie charts below indicate the primary uses of the internet in Japan in the years 1995 and 2005. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'levels'?
Suggestion: levels
...y to just over 2%, whereas in the UK it level off, after which it declined to just ov...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, whereas, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82417582418 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66371903668 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543956043956 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5624525153 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.428571429 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158810673101 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802745870677 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0169431825953 0.0843802449381 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950295273863 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279977890159 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.