Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Leader may have different vision during different period of time and society also need different form of success during time phase. Society may thought achieving this might be ultimate success at today whereas, society demand and set something different target as their triumphs. So definition and categories of success may be considered as relative term ab compared to time frame. For achieving form of success may require any leader in any fields of business, politics, education etc. and they could adopt different legal and germane pathways for attainment of their success. However, Every leader have different level of energy for doing anything for their society or for contribution towards society, they must have strong yern for achieving something. So, I would like to take moderate aggrement upon claim presented above. In order to prove and strengthen my claim, I have presented my view on following three topics.
First of all, We should consider the time changing needs of success and way of achieving to them. Before few years ago, for any leaders, success of any nation measured in terms of growth rate of economy of that country. However, In recent times the definition and concept of success may changes so hegemony in trade and in other aspects of universal governance over other country may regarded as key of indication for being success. During progress of time, thoughts and vision of any leader may not match with the view of contemporary people of that state and he/she couldn’t feel exact feel and need of their populace about development and progress. For instance, any developing country like Nepal needs leader who are keen interest on development project and who has capabilities of developing huge infrastructure within short period of time. He likely to lead the country for certain duration. However, Achieving these goal of people and need of country, there might shift in need and priorities for progress of any country. So there is likely to possible change the leadership for achieving different goal.
Similarly, success indicator and their measure can’t be same for long period of time. When time passes certain situation might get changes. We should change our leader according to our need and priorities. For example, if any football club are keen interest in winning domestic league for long period time and they haven’t achieved it even after beating other strong contender in world champion league game. There might be possible reason behind this is their coach. For winning domestic league for any club need a coach h have strong power and capability to learn about different team and must have long perseverance for winning match and league. There has several example of winning league after changing their coaches.
Again, I have certain limitation and against view regarding this topic. There might some exception for giving extra time even after 5 years of age for achieving success. During first five year tenure he might be busy in learning and understanding some rules and law required for progress. He might gt busy in formulating and implementation of law so, he wouldn’t likely to get desired result. If we look the presidential election campaign and their tenure duration in united states of America, almost large number of elected president might get another spell of his presidential tenure for serving and giving some numerous contribution towards America. He probable do huge achievement in his second in his second tenure. So, There must need some extra time for certain leader to achieve something progress.
In conclusion, we should give certain extra time for any leader for achieving something special progress in his tenure if he must had shown some positive sign of progress in his first tenure. Otherwise, there won’t have positive result to provide next time for any leader after spending his first tenure. Thus giving extra time would probable based on situation and circumstances.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 58
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most co 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 16
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 66
- Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... have different vision during different period of time and society also need different form of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 806, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld like to take moderate aggrement upon claim presented above. In order to prove...
^^
Line 3, column 836, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...loping huge infrastructure within short period of time. He likely to lead the country for cert...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 923, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this goal' or 'these goals'?
Suggestion: this goal; these goals
...or certain duration. However, Achieving these goal of people and need of country, there mi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...eir measure can't be same for long period of time. When time passes certain situation mig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...apos;t be same for long period of time. When time passes certain situation might get...
^^^^
Line 5, column 669, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun example seems to be countable; consider using: 'several examples'.
Suggestion: several examples
...for winning match and league. There has several example of winning league after changing their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, regarding, second, similarly, so, then, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in short, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 33.0 12.4196629213 266% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3343.0 2235.4752809 150% => OK
No of words: 643.0 442.535393258 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19906687403 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.03561760524 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62869129462 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 294.0 215.323595506 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457231726283 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1047.6 704.065955056 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.7461459453 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.303030303 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4848484848 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.87878787879 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 29.0 10.2758426966 282% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16349922803 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511907425212 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048973035345 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10355332482 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291266959864 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.