The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates how the different product categories of a country contributed to the export earnings in the year 2015 and 2016 whereas the table depicts the comparison of changes in each product category of export in percentagewise in the year 2016 with year 2015.
Overall, at the beginning of the period highest income from the export generated by the petroleum products while the lowest was textiles. In contrast at the end of the period petroleum products were able to remain in the highest and engineered goods also able to reach to the same income level. Although there was a considerable increased in textiles industry income at the end of the period it was remaining in the least contribution along with agricultural products.
In year the 2015 export earnings from petroleum products, engineered goods and agricultural products were approximately 60%, 68% and 30% respectively experienced slight increase by 3%, 8.5% and 0.81% respectively in the year 2016. In comparison the income from textiles rose significantly by 15.24% at the end of the period.
In the other hand the figure of gems and jewellery decreased by 5.8% at the end of the period.
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the ma 67
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ducts while the lowest was textiles. In contrast at the end of the period petroleum prod...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...able to reach to the same income level. Although there was a considerable increased in t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 235, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...0.81% respectively in the year 2016. In comparison the income from textiles rose significa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y by 15.24% at the end of the period. In the other hand the figure of gems an...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... 15.24% at the end of the period. In the other hand the figure of gems and ...
^^
Line 13, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d of the period. In the other hand the figure of gems and jewellery decreas...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15544041451 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94668820117 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481865284974 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.2411373906 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.142857143 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177189723692 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748683530482 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121107481796 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117616521741 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142824527449 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.