TED effect
The main topic of both the reading and the lecture is about a turtle excluder device (TED) effects for using to help the turtle species that are caught in the nets. The article states that some people believe TED which has been attached to the net can be helpful in this problem and provides three challenges in this way. However, in the lecture the professor refutes the idea presented in the passage by giving examples and clarifying the weaknesses of it.
First, the passage posits that since turtles get trapped in the net rarely, it is not profitable to spend money on the TED. In contrast, the professor rejects this point by saying that in the USA in each year 1000 operation occures that turtle accidentaly has been caught. On the other hand, the population of these kinds of species are very small. Therefore, it is not logical to have this amount of catch each year.
Second, the reading claims that there are some other method which are more effective than TED and can be replaced. Nevertheless, the lecturer denies this, suggesting that it is good idea but just in the theory. In her mind, the method that is proposed in the text is not practical because in out of the sea, monitoring the time limitness can not be done.
Third, according to the article's opinion TED's are not effective for larger turtles, and as a result turtles can not escape from the nets. The speaker does not agree with this point of view. She asserts that the device is modifiable and can be changed to any size.
In conclusion, the points made in the lecture contradicted the central stand point of the passage. Turtle population in comparison to their total number, lack of monitoring out of sea, and ability to change TED for turtles with different size from the lecture demonstrate that the reading's opinion about limitness of TED is in doubt.
- artifact usage found 3
- Do you agree or disagree with this statement? The world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 70
- tpo31-1 80
- Telling the truth 40
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'articles'' or 'article's'?
Suggestion: articles'; article's
... not be done. Third, according to the articles opinion TEDs are not effective for larg...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 282, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'readings'' or 'reading's'?
Suggestion: readings'; reading's
...e from the lecture demonstrate that the readings opinion about limitness of TED is in do...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69349845201 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40539543756 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513931888545 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2595477956 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.066666667 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244516921697 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758154056034 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103943609347 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142888761593 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492224815256 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.