The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors who came to the UK for
different purposes between 1989 and 2009. Summarize the information by selecting
and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The rendered linear graph illustrates the number of international tourists who came to united kingdom for business,holiday and meeting friend and relative purpose from 1989 to 2009.
Overall, it is manifest that the number of visitors for holiday purpose experienced a highest than business and meeting friend.
In the fleeting glance, it is immensely clear that from 1989 to 1990 the number of visitors for holiday purpose stood at around 6.5 millions respectively, then increased to millions in 1999, while it dipped in 2004,after that this number inclined and reached to again 6.5 millions in 2009.
Probing further, as regard business purpose decreasing to 4 millions in 1990 and increasing to 8 in 2006, the number of people dropped by 1 millions in the last year.similarly, about 3.4 millions people travelled for meeting friend and relative purpose in 1989 ,this number rose dramatically to 7 millions in 2005 .Afterthat it drop to 6 millions in the end of period.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-05-31 | Simarpreet | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , holiday
... who came to united kingdom for business,holiday and meeting friend and relative purpose...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is manifest that the number of visitors for holiday purpose experienced a highes...
^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...sitors for holiday purpose experienced a highest than business and meeting frien...
^
Line 9, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s immensely clear that from 1989 to 1990 the number of visitors for holiday purpo...
^^
Line 13, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... last year.similarly, about 3.4 millions people travelled for meeting friend and ...
^^
Line 13, column 262, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ting friend and relative purpose in 1989 ,this number rose dramatically to 7 mill...
^^
Line 13, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riend and relative purpose in 1989 ,this number rose dramatically to 7 millions i...
^^
Line 13, column 316, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... rose dramatically to 7 millions in 2005 .Afterthat it drop to 6 millions in the e...
^^
Line 13, column 318, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Afterthat
...ose dramatically to 7 millions in 2005 .Afterthat it drop to 6 millions in the end of per...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 331, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'drops'?
Suggestion: drops
...lly to 7 millions in 2005 .Afterthat it drop to 6 millions in the end of period.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20754716981 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96264468973 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.0807498907 43.030603864 219% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 207.0 112.824112599 183% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.75 22.9334400587 173% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189014458658 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137119231724 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480528282623 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137119231724 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480528282623 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.0 13.2329268293 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.35 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.