TPO 55

Essay topics:

TPO 55

The passage and the lecture discuss a box-shaped device that can solve the water problem for trees in arid areas by condensing vapors in the atmosphere. The reading presents three reasons why this idea isn’t practical. However, the professor in the lecture argues against all of these reasons by pointing out that none of them are convincing.

First, the reading claims that it would cost 25 US dollars for each tree that is an extremely high price. However, the lecturer refutes this claim and states we can use each device for about 20 trees. Thus, if you divide the cost of the device to the number of trees that it can save, you would understand that it is a reasonable price.

Second, the passage believes that motivating locale people to look after trees that cannot serve as a source of food for them is difficult. However, the professor disagrees with this opinion and believes that people can use this device to collect water for growing other plants that would provide them food. Moreover, by growing more trees they would have more sources of firewoods.

Third, the reading states that the device is not practical because the device’s ability to collect and conserve water is limited. However, the lecturer refutes this idea because he believes that this device can provide a condition for small trees to grow until their roots become long enough to reach the underground waters. Thus, in that stage, they can survive without the device. The professor presents an example about trees in the Sahara desert that surprisingly, 90 percentage of trees survived after 2 years of removing the device.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-02-20 AliKopol 85 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, third, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95955882353 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41968748876 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3152935598 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.769230769 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53846153846 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.