TPO 50
The passage and the lecture discuss the problems of traveling to Mars. The reading presents three severe problems that cause travel to Mars to become challenging. The professor in the lecture argues with all of these problems and believes there are already some solutions for all of them.
First, the passage claims, unlike going to the moon, traveling to Mars takes 2 years that need an enormous supply of food, water, and oxygen. However, the professor refutes this difficulty because some techniques help astronauts to solve this problem. For example, they can produce food by growing plants in water instead of soil, or they can recycle wastewater to solve their water problem. Also, all plants absorb carbon dioxide and produce oxygen which can help them to produce the fresh air they require.
Second, the reading states that astronauts would be in a zero-gravity environment for a couple of months which would cause some health problems with their muscle mass and bone density. The lecture opposes this idea because there are some methods that they can use to solve these problems. For instance, they should do regular exercise to maintain muscle mass. Moreover, they can use calcium pills to maintain bone density.
Third, the passage suggests that they would expose a lot to a dangerous level of space radiation. However, the professor denies this problem too. He points out that, actually, they would be exposed to the dangerous level of radiation occasionally. Thus, they can use some special instruments that display the level of radiation. Hence, when the instruments show the dangerous level of radiation they can go to a small shielded area and stay there until the dangerous level of radiation passes.
Although the reading presents three problems that cause going to Mars become difficult, the professor refutes all of them by presenting a solution for each of them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e travel to Mars to become challenging. The professor in the lecture argues with al...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13268608414 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46779404247 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488673139159 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8869197101 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2941176471 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1764705882 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 4.45695364238 269% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.