In recent years, there has been a dramatic rise in the levels of environmental pollution worldwide due to unsustainable exploitation of the earth's resources. Although some claim that measures need to be taken at an individual level, others believe that it is up to the government to bring effective policies to counter it. This essay will discuss the reasons why the government must lead the change to alleviate the effects of environmental pollution.
To begin with, one strong argument for the change to occur at an individual level is that, ultimately, it is up to each citizen to implement policies and take necessary steps to reduce environmental pollution. For instance, if each citizen can vow not to use single-use plastics, then the businesses that operate on them would be forced to find other suitable alternatives. Moreover, research suggests that reliance on public transport can reduce vehicular pollution by half. Adequate awareness needs to be imparted among the young children to carry this work forward.
However, there are several arguments in favour of the government being the main entity capable of leading the change. The government has sufficient infrastructure, monetary and human resources at its disposal that can be used to reduce the damage being caused to the environment. This can be done by formulating and implementing policies that are aimed at reducing the overall pollution. Such policies will make it mandatory for organizations and individuals to take this issue seriously and work towards solving it.
To conclude, despite the importance of individuals to reduce the factors leading to environmental pollution, it is the responsibility of the government to spearhead and drive the changes to reduce pollution. In my opinion, specific policies by the government and concerned citizens are a healthy combination to solve this problem.
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- Some people think women should be given equal chances to work and excel in their careers. Others believe that a woman’s role should be limited to taking care of the house and children. Which opinion do you agree with and why? Include specific details an 77
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, then, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 31.9359605911 153% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 5.75862068966 365% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37627118644 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11027617237 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566101694915 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2048739731 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209650052377 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081264015157 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050762286199 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133785717443 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492158135389 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.