School learning is a crucial part of a student's education. It forms a base for the decision of which higher education path the student wants to follow. It should be informative as well as entertaining so that it is easier to get a grasp on the basics which would actually help the person his whole life. While mandating a national curriculum nation-wide for schools may seem beneficial initially, it will have tremendous adverse effects in the education ecosystem in the long run.
Forcing the students of a nation to follow a standard syllabus will prohibit exploratory learning and quench their imagination. It would not let them be innovative by thinking outside the box. A fixed curriculum will also lead to mundane work for the teachers, teaching the same fixed syllabus repeatedly year after year. It will severely hamper with the minds of the future of the nation.
A country is a huge place with a gigantic population. Such a population is definitely going to have a diverse culture and their own ethics. These are passed on to new generations through primary education, particularly in pre-schools and mid-schools. Fixing the curriculum will have no space for cultural awareness and will eventually lead to lost heritages. It will be a terrible loss for a nation and humanity as well.
Such a case could be seen in 1983 India, a time when education was booming in the rural areas. The Indian government mandated a strict national curriculum to be followed along with a standard language for education, English. This led to a temporary boost in students' performance nationally. But in the years to come, the people started to notice that their kids started showing disdain for education and had trouble memorizing their local languages and ethics. India being a hugely diverse country, could not afford this loss. The government immediately softened the noose around this law and gave freedom to teach extra subjects to be decided by the schools.
Any law prohibiting the scope of education should be thoroughly pondered upon and past cases must be considered before being implied. It can irreversibly a country's greatest economic asset. Such a thing would definitely happen if it is required for pre-college education to follow a national curriculum.
- 1.Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sur 66
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or dis 50
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
School learning is a crucial part of a students education. It forms a base for the deci...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 157, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'countrys the greatest'.
Suggestion: countrys the greatest
...re being implied. It can irreversibly a countrys greatest economic asset. Such a thing would defi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, may, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09115281501 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86568463683 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57908847185 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2640788193 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3181818182 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9545454545 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.59090909091 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158739205118 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474704864436 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528115382107 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986343210003 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389906784319 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.