Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In today’s world, there is an increasingly popular tendency that animals are used as experiment objects for new medicines and other product testings. While some people are of the opinion that those experiments should be prohibited as it violates animal rights and is immortal, some still hold the belief that animal testing should be maintained due to its benefits to human life. From my perspective, I find the former agreeable for several reasons.
On the one hand, some people have their points to be against animal testing. The first reason worth mentioning is the fact that a medicine passed the safety test on an animal does not mean that it is one hundred percent safe for humans to use. It is obvious that each species has its own characteristics and gene; therefore, different reactions on a specific medicine will be likely to happen. The second argument is that animal testing is clearly cruel and dramatically violates animal rights. To be more specific, in most of the experiments, not only do animals have to suffer deadly pain, but they are also often killed. Another reason supporting a ban on animal testing is that it is costly to do experiments on animals, as it involves huge investments in state-of-the-art equipment, specialized laboratories, security and training costs for specialists. Clearly, creating an artificial body to do the tests on and developing Artificial Intelligent to analysis and evaluate the effectiveness and safety of new medicines seem to be better choices in the long-term.
On the other hand, it is reasonable to believe that animal testing should be maintained, due to its advantages. First of all, it is undeniable that all medicines should be tested for side effects and safety reasons. In fact, at present, doing experiments on animals is the only way to ensure that medicines are safe for humans to use. Secondly, humans should be prioritized over animals. Specifically, it is absolutely better for an animal to suffer, rather than a human to die, for life-saving purposes. Last but not least, animal testing can help scientists and doctors find new treatments or ways to save lives. For instance, by doing a lot of experiments on bats and rats, specialists were successful in developing a vaccine to effectively prevent humans from Ebola which killed millions of African people in 2015.
In conclusion, although it is immortal and expensive to do animal testing, medical experiments on animals for the safety and life-saving purposes should be kept running due to its irrefutable benefits to humanity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-11 | Trần Nhã Vân | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-13 | nguyễn ngân hiếu | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | Bao Ngoc Nguyen | 87 | view |
- You stayed over at a friend’s house last weekend and think that you left your watch there.Thank your friendDescribe your watchTell them what you want them to do 73
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food clothing or medicine To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience 82
- Many people believe that money is a good gift for a teenagers while others disagree.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 78
- Some people think that advertising aimed at children should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 13.1623246493 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2152.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 419.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13603818616 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97475053651 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515513126492 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0101000827 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.555555556 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2777777778 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381865794024 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127927391162 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674692842392 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262809720165 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559381551282 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.