Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should read only those books that are about real events, real people and established facts. Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion.
Some people enjoy reading fiction books for how much emotions they evoke inside of us. Sad stories could make us feel down while motivational tales give a spirit of positivity. As a result, many individuals are intrigued by literature and prefer to spend their free time following the events of a long novel. However, I opt for books which are more about real people and real facts over ones that include fantasy for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, focusing on works of imagination could end up being a waste of time and useless. In other words, very few benefits could be gained through these kinds of books, such as improving innovation skills through exposing our minds to different imaginary scenarios, and even this claim is not based on any scientific facts. To illustrate more thoroughly, not a single scientist or researcher ever argued that reading novels has helped him or her in their discoveries. I can think of one example here from my personal life. When I was a kid, I used to read a lot of science fiction novels. I thought it would improve my academic abilities. Nonetheless, after many years, I stopped my habit of reading these superficial novels since I was not able to attribute any gains I achieved by reading books that do not have anything to do with reality.
Second, reading books about real facts and real people is extremely beneficial. By reading these books, we could improve our capabilities and our knowledge. Therefore, we could discover new opportunities and put our talents to work. For instance, going through books that deal with our careers could open more doors for us to get better jobs. In addition, being informed about the local news will help us to avoid areas of crimes and stay safe. Moreover, learning facts about the economy will allow us to make better business and investment decisions.
To conclude, I am of the opinion that people should concentrate on reading books about real and factual information that help them in their work and their life as a whole
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | bishoy | 83 | view |
| 2016-10-21 | Romaisa Khan | 66 | view |
- grain based food 83
- yellow cedar 75
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 75
- The little ice age was a period of unusually cold temperature in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900CE. There were unusually harsh winters, and glaciers grew larger in many areas. Scientist have long wondered what cause 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ple enjoy reading fiction books for how much emotions they evoke inside of us. Sad s...
^^^^
Line 9, column 553, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tter business and investment decisions. To conclude, I am of the opinion that pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in their work and their life as a whole
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87005649718 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59090064017 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598870056497 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4874082823 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7777777778 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222935250128 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660337123833 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871885274325 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150738592698 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494569342065 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.