The charts below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.
The pie charts compare the GDP of three countries that growth year on year since 2007 to 2010. Overall, the data show that the highest GDP was Tunisia, on the other hand Ecuador's GDP was the lowest.
In 2007 there was an increased in the total of GDP that pretty significant on Japan that reaches 100%, higher than the other two countries. Similar increase also happen in Ecuador, even though that did not significant as Japan, which is only 35%. On the other hand, Tunisia experienced decrease on their GDP for about 30%, which was the lowest on that year. In the next two years, Japan GDP constantly growth and made it reaches the highest GDP growth, above 6%. Tunisia which was had the highest GDP in 2007, subtantially fall untill 2010. Meanwhile Ecuador became the only country that always fluctuate in every year and remained just under 5%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Jesslynindah | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Arman Mansyur | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | jenmin | 61 | view |
- The charts below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 56
- The pie chart below describe about the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 56
- The charts below show one government's spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in arts events in the same years. 67
- The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing. what is the reason for the growth in overweight people in society? How can this problem be solved? 84
- The charts below show one government s spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in Arts events in the same years 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 542, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...in 2007, subtantially fall untill 2010. Meanwhile Ecuador became the only country that al...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 703.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71812080537 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21728552946 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604026845638 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 191.7 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.169029037 43.030603864 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.875 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324801846645 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153627345072 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145225707089 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311340028956 0.15604864568 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102992242617 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.