Nowadays, celebrities increasingly have status of role models, in particular for younger people.
Nowadays, in our thriving world the pace of our life at the rapid stage, day by day the number of famous people are increasing because of development in the world. They become popular in a diverse sphere such as science, art, technology, and so on. Most of them are good, and some of them are bad. They gain popularity because of young generations that are always resembling their lifestyle, fashion and sometimes behave similarly and pursue on various social websites. I believe that there is no contradictory effect of it, but they should keep the distance and try to be as themselves.
First of all, famous people are equivalent. There are similar to, working-class people but they are popular-priced. Predominantly, it does not inform, that simple citizen should imitate them and be their bipartisan. If prominence commits a heroic deed, it may be an underlying reason for copying not other actions, such as smoking cigarettes. Explicitly, it affects on a wrong way that makes youngsters more discourteous.
Secondly, the admirable person of followers should be their parents. Due to the number of reasons, first, they provide with clothes, money and other needs. Secondly, they send children to school or college to acquire knowledge. In my point of view, they can also sacrifice their life for their children if it is needed. For these reasons, we should respect them and support when they face hardships or help to tackle issues. Undoubtedly, there are need not for reflecting star because they have origins.
In conclusion, all megastars are not examples of duplicating, but many of them are adorable and young followers can do it, but they are not as good as parents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | Miraziz | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | shohruh.fayzulloyev | 56 | view |
- With the increasing use and development of new technology,many machines are now able to do the work which people used to perform 61
- With the increasing use and development of new technology,many machines are now able to do the work which people used to perform 61
- The diagram below show the life of the salmon 78
- The diagram below show the life of the salmon. 78
- With the increasing use and development of new technology,many machines are now able to do the work which people used to perform 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an. If prominence commits a heroic deed, it may be an underlying reason for copyi...
^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng reason for copying not other actions, such as smoking cigarettes. Explicitly, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04285714286 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83717127018 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592857142857 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.292261969 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0588235294 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0583546936986 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0176479831328 0.084324248473 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313271868994 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0302948279129 0.151304729494 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023291845431 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.