When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Nowadays, technological advances and their rapid and wide applications are having a significant impact on a nation’s traditional skills and ways of life. Some argue that such impact is so extraordinary that it would make conventional skills and life styles obsolete. However, I believe they would continue to thrive by providing alternatives to modern ways of life, and innovative ideas for modern technologies.
First of all, traditional skills and ways of life are becoming an alternative solution to the problems caused by “mainstreamed” ways of life which are greatly influenced by modern technologies. For instance, a cozy restaurant where traditional, home-brewed beer is served, offers another experience to people who are bored with branded beers that have the same flavor and come out of mass production with new technologies. It is in such a venue where traditional skills are preserved, people become relaxed and educated. Providing diversity and thus enriching modern ways of life, such traditional skills and ways of life would continue to have their place.
Furthermore, conventional skills provide innovative ideas to the development of modern technologies. For example, sparkled by how the word “Love” is traditionally knitted into a sweater by some ethnic minority women in some parts of Asia, some business managers from textile industry have developed some production lines by applying the traditional skills to Computer-Aided Designs (CAD). The products have boosted the companies’ sales which in turn have increased their investment in preserving traditional skills for further developing their technologies.
To conclude, traditional skills and life styles are increasingly becoming a useful alternative to the homogeneity brought by global applications of modern technologies. However, the evolution of technologies is a selection process, whereby some would become obsolete, but there is no doubt that some would thrive when their roles are appreciated.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-04-01 | shanimokir | 78 | view |
2019-03-21 | Bharat Goswami | 73 | view |
2019-01-26 | MAD__FOODIEEE | 73 | view |
2019-01-24 | Koragg7 | 84 | view |
2017-09-26 | johnlemon | 73 | view |
- In the past most people lived in small villages where everyone knew everyone else Nowdays most people live in large cities where they only know a few people in their area What do you think were the advantages and disadvantages of living in small community 70
- The table below show information about travelling to work in one US city. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 60
- The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011 63
- discuss about disadvantage and advantage of internet, give your own opinion? 70
- Internet is probably the most significant invention of the last 30 years. Without it, our lives would be completely different.The what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge o 43
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 297 350
No. of Characters: 1643 1500
No. of Different Words: 156 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.151 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.532 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.115 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 126 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 93 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 75 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.388 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.422 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.623 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.098 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5