Filtering school students proves to be a controversial issue withwhich many have been dealing in the past few years. Thesedays, it is being observed that some claim that separating them based on the academic capability is beneficial to them,however, some others atate that all students should be educated in mixed ability classes. this essay discusses both sides of the view, and then i will give my own prospective which is for the separation of them.
The proponents of classifying students based on the academic ability put forward that it can improve their talent. Focusing on exclusively one subject, pupils will have enough time to boost it up because they learn and practice more about it, which results in not wasting time on unnecessary subjects. it is said that they can gradually cope it complex matters due to they have been taught more than others, from the academy point of view. for example, when a child has a talent in math, in separated classes, he or she does not need to spend time as much as others do to get the subject. these ones can boost their learning in comparison with others. Also, in segregated classes, students have a rivalry with others who are talented the same as them. Therefore, these are the reasons of sorting students, accordance to the advocates of this notion.
Nevertheless, those arguing for mixed ability classes bring up that it is better environment for students with various subjects. It leads children to learning from each other so that improve the ability in which they have a weakness. For instance, a weak student in sport can improve themselves with the aim of their peers to practice more and overcome it. being with others creates a sportive and competitive atmosphere where all pupils are being encouraged to put efforts in being the best. Besides, sorting students academically brings about inferiority in those not being included in the academic group in addition to the sense of superiority in the selective ones. As an example the pupils in the classified classes are more likely to feel proud. they probably look down other students while this group has the feeling of abandon. hence these are the cases why the mixed ability classes are better, based on the fans of this view.
In conclusion, although both views have their own merits, those who opt for filtering pupils academically are of much higher logic to me. From my vantage point, focusing on one talent is the most efficient way to develop it by sorting the students. Should children learn what they are gifted in, they will have a chance to succeed in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , however
...cademic capability is beneficial to them,however, some others atate that all students sh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...d be educated in mixed ability classes. this essay discusses both sides of the view...
^^^^
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ility classes. this essay discusses both sides of the view, and then i will give ...
^^
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...usses both sides of the view, and then i will give my own prospective which is f...
^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...t wasting time on unnecessary subjects. it is said that they can gradually cope it...
^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'complexes'?
Suggestion: complexes
...is said that they can gradually cope it complex matters due to they have been taught mo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...others, from the academy point of view. for example, when a child has a talent in m...
^^^
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...s much as others do to get the subject. these ones can boost their learning in compar...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'these' instead.
Suggestion: these
...s much as others do to get the subject. these ones can boost their learning in comparison ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 671, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e of superiority in the selective ones. As an example the pupils in the classified...
^^
Line 5, column 753, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... classes are more likely to feel proud. they probably look down other students while...
^^^^
Line 5, column 837, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
... this group has the feeling of abandon. hence these are the cases why the mixed abili...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 837, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: hence,
... this group has the feeling of abandon. hence these are the cases why the mixed abili...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 24.0651302605 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 441.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57608148624 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507936507937 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 678.6 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4243469064 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47619047619 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.01903807615 259% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235447260241 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654454235596 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510115475976 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147923393567 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493555891851 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.