Some governments believe it is necessary to impose a higher tax on junk food because an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much of this type of food. What do you think about this?
Higher consumption of junk food is the major reason why the world is suffering from a serious problem like obesity. Some people believe that the government should impose higher taxes on junk food so that they can solve the issue of obesity. This essay will discuss why I support the motion which includes enforcing the fast-food companies to pay a higher number of tariffs.
Firstly, raising taxes will discourage people from consuming junk food which will stop them from getting obese. People tend to eat unhealthy fast food because it is cheap to buy. If the government starts imposing taxes on junk food, the price of them will rise which will deter people from eating them. For example, the Australian government has put a higher tariff on sugary drinks and fast food. As a result, the consumption of these unhealthy food has gone down there. Other countries should follow the trend that Australia has set on junk food so that they can solve the issue of obesity.
Furthermore, on a practical level, this initiative would provide the government with more funding that they can use to raise awareness of the negative sides of consuming junk food among general people. Higher consumption of junk food means that people are eating more sugar, fat, and salt which can result in heart diseases and strokes. Tax from fast food could be used by the government to fund advertising campaigns to deter people from eating it. For example, the Australian government often put billboards on the road which encourages people to eat more healthy foods such as fruits rather than consuming foods like burger and pizza.
In conclusion, Unhealthy food habits are having a detrimental impact on people’s health all over the world. An increase in the tariff on junk food will have a positive impact not only because it would raise the price of fast food that will discourage people from eating it, but also the government will be able to raise more awareness to tackle the issue of obesity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | aeropiyush | 95 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | rafsunielts2019 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | rafsunielts2019 | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that it is important to give gifts and presents to friends and family toshow that we care about them.Others think that there are better ways to show that wecare about them.Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some parents think its good to have their children mobile phones, others disagree.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 67
- A friend who lives in another country has invited you to come and stay with him her on your next holiday You are too busy to accept the invitation Write a letter to your friend to thank him for the invitation explain the reasons why you can t come and ask 87
- Some people believe that it is important to give gifts and presents to friends and family toshow that we care about them.Others think that there are better ways to show that wecare about them.Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 639, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... consuming foods like burger and pizza. In conclusion, Unhealthy food habits are...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91097922849 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42941366088 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486646884273 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1278851949 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4666666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393717229024 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155876842514 0.084324248473 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501438982496 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268417746321 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460651349089 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.