Polygamy has increased widely in recent years. What solutions can you bring forward to decrease this issue?
In recent years, the practice of polygamy has grown manifold in both developing and developed nations. While some people believe that it is an acceptable consequence of the modern complex relationships, others consider this as a deleterious influence. This essay will discuss why this practice is prevalent today and explicate solutions to alleviate this issue.
To begin with, one strong argument for the practice of polygamy being widely observed is the transition from a conservative to a liberal attitude in mature societies. Traditionally, second marriages were considered as either illegal or a social embarrassment. For example, unsuccessful couples in India, avoided another marriage citing factors such as social stigma and stereotyping. Consequently, several eminent personalities hold a pragmatic view and consider polygamy as normal, influencing people to imitate them, which has ultimately resulted in an overwhelming increase in polygamy cases internationally.
However, there are several solutions to limit the proliferation of polygamy incidents. Firstly, society must reorient its liberal ideology and recommend counselling and expert advice to sort out marriage differences rather than advocating immediate legal separation. Moreover, religious institutions should encourage having single-partners for life, which will reduce polygamy significantly. For instance, if preachers of all major religion can condemn polygamy, it will result in a dramatic reduction. The government can introduce litigation making polygamy illegal, which will dissuade young couples from taking the extreme step of dissolving one's marriage.
To conclude, although polygamy is rising sharply, society must advance a mentality shift to discourage individuals from marrying again. In my opinion, advocating the importance of single marriage and resolving marriage differences amicably will reduce this phenomenon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-27 | richierich25 | 85 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | manu.amb | 72 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | venkatesh1018 | 77 | view |
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society.To what extent do you agree with this view? 11
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn. Agree or disagree. 77
- It is important that maintain and protect the beautiful building in the past even if it is expensive for owners to do so what do you think of this statement Give reasons and examples on your own experience 89
- The means of communicating in society has changed markedly over the last ten years. In your opinion, what are the positive and negative impacts of this change? 11
- Some people think that exercise is the key to health while others feel that having a balanced diet is more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 646, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...m taking the extreme step of dissolving ones marriage. To conclude, although po...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.16791044776 5.00649968141 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22321329122 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671641791045 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.57093596059 127% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.727693494 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.071428571 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.25397266985 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181037031046 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569123425919 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460826724558 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101320647187 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466278177934 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.35 53.1260098522 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.51 11.5310837438 161% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.3 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 55.0591133005 207% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.