A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature—novels, plays, and poems—than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for culture in general, and for the future of literature itself.
While there has been a decline in book reading generally, the decline has been especially sharp for literature. This is unfortunate because nothing else provides the intellectual stimulation that literature does. Literature encourages us to exercise our imaginations, empathize with others, and expand our understanding of language. So by reading less literature, the reading public is missing out on important benefits.
Unfortunately, missing out on the benefits of literature is not the only problem. What are people reading instead? Consider the prevalence of self-help books on lists of best sellers. These are usually superficial poorly written, and intellectually undemanding. Additionally, instead of sitting down with a challenging novel, many persons are now more likely to turn on the television, watch a music video, or read a Web page. Clearly, diverting time previously spent in reading literature to trivial forms of entertainment has lowered the level of culture in general.
The trend of reading less literature is all the more regrettable because it is taking place during a period when good literature is being written. There are many talented writers today, but they lack an audience. This fact is bound to lead publishers to invest less in literature and so support fewer serious writers. Thus, the writing as well as the reading of literature is likely to decline because of the poor standards of today's readers.
The reading states that today's people less interested in reading literature and as a result this trend effects some unfortunate in culture and future of literature. However, the lecturer challenged the claims made by the author. He explains that While people now less like reading book but it does not mean that to decline the value of culture and others things and each of the claims of the author,s are unconvincing and The lecturer refutes each of the author's claims.
First of all, the reading argues that now people are less like to reading literature, as a result people are missing some important benefits, because literature provides som intellectual stimulation.because by the reding of literature helps to enhance our imaginations and expand our understanding of language. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that not only literature books, also others reading like science, but political and other books also have some creativity and help to improve our brain's cognitive power, thus emphasize our brain
is not mean that to need literature reading only.
Secondly, the reading states that peoples are now diverted, they so much like to watch Tv shows or like listening to the song rather than reading literature books, as a resulting decline the cultural values and looses their intellectuality. The lecturer, However, rebuts this claim that now there are various form to approach to culture, and some way more direct and more considerable rather than reading form. The lecturer, furthermore, says that to listening briliantsong or to saw Tv show does not mean that to decline cultural value because this approacjhes helps to people get the culture more easily.
Finally, the reading posits that the result of poor standards of readers, publisher less like to invested and support serious leterature writers. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that this is not reader problems, it is actually author problem, because readrs are some do not understant the language of literature and sometime not to specify what plot actually writer tried to made, thus this argument of reader does not hold any consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | S M Naimul Mamun | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | S M Naimul Mamun | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | Manu2525 | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | jewel | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | Udari | 80 | view |
- The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insects. Unfortunately, the toad 73
- If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable. 76
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view. 70
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 73
- In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M. Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book (manuscript) written on vellum (vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper). The “Voynich manuscript,” as it became 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , s
...ngs and each of the claims of the author,s are unconvincing and The lecturer refut...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Is
...itive power, thus emphasize our brain is not mean that to need literature readin...
^^
Line 11, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecturer, However, rebuts this claim that now there are various form to approach t...
^^
Line 15, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tandards of readers, publisher less like to invested and support serious leteratu...
^^
Line 15, column 236, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'authored'.
Suggestion: authored
... is not reader problems, it is actually author problem, because readrs are some do not...
^^^^^^
Line 15, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...plot actually writer tried to made, thus this argument of reader does not hold an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1373.03311258 133% => OK
No of words: 347.0 270.72406181 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25360230548 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81729731577 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489913544669 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 568.8 419.366225166 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.1864439567 49.2860985944 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.727272727 110.228320801 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5454545455 21.698381199 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3636363636 7.06452816374 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25293032632 0.272083759551 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106806233076 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829345196091 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149401616794 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457048591382 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.3589403974 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.0289183223 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.