Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world, subjects like science and technology are more important than history.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is often said that children benefit from learning history. However, some people might argue that science and technology are more vital subjects than history, especially in today's technology-focused world. This essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, those who support putting history in the curriculum of children cite various benefits that history can bring to a kid. This range about revolution events and famous people, who changed the world as we know it. The expert argues that we cannot ignore the importance of knowing about the past to create a better future, for example. The presence of the smart car today is the result of the constant effort the person who invented wheels around 3,800 B.C., which had a fundamental impact on the transfer and agriculture industry.
On the other hand, the opponents of the debate have a convincing reason that sciences and technology are more vital subject than history. We are living in the digital era which technology improver faster than before and children must be prepared for future development. The result of a study which accomplished in Europe indicated that, if people were upgraded their abilities they would find a good job with great income in the time to come, for example, the tools for simple surgery are changing every day, if you are an expert surgeon but ignored learning work with modern facilities then you will experience Job insecurity soon.
In conclusion, I believe that history and science and technology courses are all key to promoting the people and their countries. They should co-exist in the development of today’s world.
- The bar chart below show the number of tourists visiting two different cities by season 67
- The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from 1983 to 2003
- Some children have a natural ability to grasp foreign languages and for that reason it should not be a mandatory subject in the academic curriculum Do you agree or Disagree 78
- governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience You should write at least 250 wor 67
- The charts below show the proportion of British student at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13284132841 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64377688968 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623616236162 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.3487130292 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.916666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265508622496 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929900926206 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835371350129 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166272291372 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838238751679 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.