Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious problem, as well as practical problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is undoubtedly true that people who domicile temporary in foreign countries probably will face problems related with social and daily life caused by language. I completely agree with this statement because it tend to lead the misunderstanding between local people and expatriate people and decrease foreigners daily life productivity.
The main problem when foreigners come to a non-English country are prejudice between natives and new comers. It is caused by language issue which natives only proficient to interact with their own language while foreigner only speak in International language, English. This case usually happens when people for long-term purposes come to foreign countries where the citizen has high pride when using their language, such as Germany or Japan. For instance, local people will judge the foreigners as arrogant people because the foreigners have not tried to interact with the locals. On contrast, foreigners also judge local less empathy to new comers since less interaction. Thus, this occurrence lead to social impairment between foreigners and locals.
The other problems could be possibly revealed is the decrease of life productivity. This occurrence mainly happened on foreigners because they are facing lack of understanding on local language that commonly used for many activities. For instance, when foreigners using electronic utensils for cooking, they need more times to understand the way of the machine operated. In some cases, it could be possibly worsened since the guideline book has not provided International language. On more complex cases, sometimes it will completely consume time like interaction with government staff for administration purposes. Thus, it will presumably lead to inefficient foreigner activities.
Finally, I completely agree that when foreigners come to non-English country will face social and practical problems since lack of understanding with locals and inefficient daily activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | Mr. Fithroni | 61 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013 84
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDisucss both the 84
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'tends'?
Suggestion: tends
...ly agree with this statement because it tend to lead the misunderstanding between lo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, thus, while, for instance, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77133105802 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96945195865 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511945392491 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4786457718 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.733333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19602035695 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725663087317 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448223783612 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135921555799 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412723555317 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.