In the future, students will have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television of studying at traditional schools. What would you prefer?
Technology is increasingly playing a crucial part in the learning process of students around the global, resulting in a trend in which students choose to study at home by the utilization of technology. However, to my view, I still believe that only traditional schools can provide the best learning environment for children and youngsters.
To commence with, it is scientifically proven that direct human interaction can lead to a higher positive education outcome. Students will definitely have a deeper understanding about the subjects when they have to focus more on the lecture. The presence of the teacher and all the disciplines in the class makes it impossible for students to be easily distracted and do something else, which is totally in contrast with using the computer to study at home. Furthermore, students not only have a good command of knowledge but also are equipped with integral skills by means of direct communication which includes discussion with teachers and friends, debate, doing presentation, and team work. This will provide every students with chances to learn actively, express themselves and compete with their peers, which undoubtedly makes them more eager to learn and achieve the best results.
In addition to that, conventional schools undeniably play the most pivotal part in the comprehensive development of children and adolescents. Initially, physical activities consisting of both formal physical education lessons and extra- curricular activities are a guarantee for a healthy young generation of the country. Reasonable timetable at schools will reduce the stress, pressure from academic learning and the possibility of suffering from diseases of students thanks to physical movements. Moreover, personality development of students is only promoted by the thorough guide of teachers. It is critically vital for students to learn to become a good citizen with standardized morality before they acquire knowledge and skills. Teachers will be the ones who instill in students positive social ethics, teach them to avoid social evils and lead them to the right path.
To sum up, I wholeheartedly believe that only going to schools, can students receive the best education.
- Professional sports people are often idolised by young children. Some people think that they, therefore, have a responsibility to be good role models at all times for children. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of public. To what extent do you agree? 84
- Nowadays many older people choose to live in retirement communities rather than living with their adult children Is it a positive or negative development 73
- Some people think it is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Commuication through text messaging and other instant forms of online communication are short and basic Some people think that this will be the deatah of grammar and spelling Do you agree or disagree 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 878, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... evils and lead them to the right path. To sum up, I wholeheartedly beli...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, in addition, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4693877551 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00068132806 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565597667638 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3805139984 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197832607143 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645029425586 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673299415109 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117488911019 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478694723027 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.