A glance at the chart provided reveals some striking trends about recycling of different different material during 1982 to 2010.
Overall, paper and cardboard along with glass containers experienced some fluctuations, however, the overall trend stayed up beat and cans as well as plastics were recycled the least.
According to the chart, paper and cardboard was recycled the most in 1982, nearly 65%. The number increased slightly, followed by a dip in about 1990, 65% again. The most paper and cardboard was recycled around 1994, a all-time high through out the given period. In 2010, 70% paper and cardboard was recycled. On the other hand, the number of glass containers started at 50% in 1982 and experienced a dip in 1990, 40% followed by a steady increase that end it at 60% in 2010.
Cans, however, witnessed a steady increase, just under 5% in 1982 to nearly 45% in 2010. The least material that was recycled was plastic, started to be recycled at just under 5% in 1986 to just below 10% in 2010.
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000. 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 61
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of major university in 2012. 56
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time, and have health problems as a result.Why do so many working people not get enough exercise? What can be done about this problem? 78
- In some areas of the US, a ‘curfew’ is imposed, in which teenagers are not allowed to be out of doors after a particular time at night unless they are accompanied by an adult.What is your opinion of this? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: different
...some striking trends about recycling of different different material during 1982 to 2010. Overa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...and cardboard was recycled around 1994, a all-time high through out the given per...
^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...s recycled around 1994, a all-time high through out the given period. In 2010, 70% paper an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52725269998 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545977011494 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3980974096 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4444444444 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206226733588 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893995306986 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676907692505 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140355418763 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699937871934 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.