The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.
The graph delineates the information on men and women employees across the globe including six nations namely Australia, Switzerland, Iceland, the UK and the USA in the years 1995 and 2005. Unit is measured in fraction.
As an overall assessment, it is explicitly observed that all the countries reveal that the employment ratio of male and female has been proliferated throughout of period.
In the preliminary stage, it is astoundingly true that the ratio of male employment was very high as compared to female in 1995 in Australia which was around 55% and 25% but after 10 years, the percentage of employment has been soared for both genders. Switzerland and Iceland show the most staggering proportion of employment for male in 1995 and 2005. New Zeeland and Australia show the ratio of employment for female almost the same for ten years. The UK, New Zeeland and USA were revealed similar rates of employment for male in 1995 and 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | gulbakhyt_90 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | kaka singh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | ketan | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | pritam | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The charts show the amount and quality of water supplied to two regions of the world. 73
- IN SOME COUNTRIES MOST PEOPLE PREFER TO RENT THEIR HOMES RATHER THAN BUYING THEM WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF RANTING A HOME 63
- IN SOME COUNTRIES, MOST PEOPLE PREFER TO RENT THEIR HOMES RATHER THAN BUYING THEM. WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF RANTING A HOME? 56
- The movement of people from the countryside into the cities is happening in many parts of the world, resulting in the problems, especially in cities.What are the causes of this movement, and how can it be reversed 56
- SOME PEOPLE THINK GOVERNMENTS SHOULD FOCUS ON REDUCING ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION AND HOUSING PROBLEMS TO HELP PEOPLE PREVENT ILLNESS AND DISEASE. TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96226415094 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79890466633 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9812160176 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.714285714 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29689438436 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125749566244 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774933126181 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165901192425 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557788664328 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.