At present, it has become common among students to take a gap year after graduating the school instead of applying immediately for a university. Peraonally, I support this idea, as it can give students time to think about their future carefully and gain work experience.
First of all, taking a gap year can provide students with time to think about their future carefully. A twelve-year study may make students exhausted and a gap year is a good way to refresh their mind. Many students feel uncertain about their future jobs and career because of the limited atmosphere at schools. As they travel to other places they test themselves in different spheres which can give them an opportunity to choose one of the options as a future career and study that field deeply at university. One more advantage of a year off is that it can provide juniors with a chance of gaining work experience which is valuable to go up through their career ladder. In addition to this, they can use that year to earn some money that they can spend to cover the fees when they apply for a university. Because not all of the students take a sabbatical to refresh their mind but to be able to support themselves financially when they enter a university.
On the other hand, a gap year may not be so beneficial as students thought. Who chooses the junior that owes no qualifications among so many candidates with a high school diploma. In this case they can neither gain work experience nor earn money. Furthermore, travelling to another place may be dangerous, as the level of being robbed, staying homeless and jobless is very high.
To sum up, after 12 years at school youngsters may get tired of studying further. In this case taking a year off seems to be a good way for those students as it provides them with a chance of gaining valuable work experience and some time to brush up their mind. Despite the drawbacks of this idea students may get more benefits.
- Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience. Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 56
- organizing a large family celebration such as a wedding can often create problems. what can be the problems associated with organizing a large family event and what solutions can you suggest ? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 823, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...hey apply for a university. Because not all of the students take a sabbatical to refresh t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter a university. On the other hand, a gap year may not be so beneficial as s...
^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... experience nor earn money. Furthermore, travelling to another place may be dange...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, in addition, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67441860465 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61027087898 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479651162791 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4260653723 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291911084719 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108967850593 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715843635852 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208190140127 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523179047758 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.