Some people believe that the responsibility for the protection of the environment is by a transnational organization, rather than by each individual country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Due to the increasing exacerbation of environmental problems, people hold different views about how to cope with them. Some people argue that protecting the environment should be the duty of each individual nation, while others believe that it should be the responsibility of a cross-border organization. From my viewpoint, although each country needs to be responsible for the protection its own natural landscapes, there should also be an international governing body that monitors each country’s actions.
There are many reasons why everyone nation and its inhabitants should take responsibility for the protection of the environment. To begin with, despite being the common concerns, environmental degradation stems from various perpetrators. Therefore, each nation should implement different policies and measures to tackle the problem. To illustrate, record-breaking temperature and extended drought are identified as the main culprit for catastrophic fire conditions in Australia; whereas, the climate change, Santa Ana winds and sparks created by people in California converged to create deadly bushfire season in 2018. In addition to this, the people who live in a country are ones who will primarily affected by environmental destruction such as contaminated air and toxic emissions within that country, and it is these people who should be most concerned.
On the other hand, ironically, many nations are struggling with corruption. Hence, it is vital for an international organization to heighten people’s awareness about environmental issues. Many people around the world simply do not realize the short and long-term impacts that their actions have on the environment, and I believe that education is one effective answer to help solve this problem. Another cause of concern is that the actions of one country’s environmental destruction can have negative impacts on nearby neighboring countries, and this is where an international organization can help to monitor such circumstances.
To recapitulate, although environmental protection needs to be the responsibility of each individual nation, there should also be one transnational organization that educates and monitors environmental concerns. There are many countries, yet only one planet, and therefore there needs to be coöperation in order for a healthy and sustainable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | Châu Cương Chí | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Phạm Phú Trường | 84 | view |
- With the pressures on today’s young people to succeed academically, some people believe that non-academic subjects at school (physical education or cookery) should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 89
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the disadvantages and advantages for young people who decide to do this. 89
- It is often said that the subjects taught in schools are too academic in orientation and that it would be more useful for children to learn about practical matters such as home management, work and interpersonal skills. 84
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can government do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 61
- Some people believe that the responsibility for the protection of the environment is by a transnational organization, rather than by each individual country. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, therefore, whereas, while, in addition, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82471264368 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4331408752 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554597701149 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2428177973 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.785714286 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18999046461 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676275048904 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669305563843 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122820389384 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588381134803 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.