In the epoch of modernization, changes are taking place in every sphere of life and studies are no exception. The syllabus, content and method of teaching has gone through various changes in recent years, and studying films is one such change. I am against the statement that studying films is important to learn literature.
On the one hand, critics may argue that learning films is important for students to learn literature, as it helps them to understand literature in an easy manner. As an instance, after studying the films on the works of Shakespeare, it is easy to learn his literature works.
On the other hand, there are many reasons to believe that studying films at school is not important for children to learn literature. Firstly, literature explains a situation in a detailed manner, which children can easily grasp and acknowledge, whereas the films are concise and they are source of limited learning for students. Hence, learning films do not help in learning literature. Secondly, childen studying films get diverted from actual facts, but consider films as entertainment only. Instead, they can learn literature more, by spending same time in learning literature directly.
To recapitulate, after deliberating over all the points discussed in the above paragraphs, there is not even an iota of doubt that studying films at school is not important for children to learn literature, as it provides limited knowledge and divert students from actual learning.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: pras701
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an easy manner" with adverb for "easy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... it helps them to understand literature in an easy manner. As an instance, after studying the fil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a detailed manner" with adverb for "detailed"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...irstly, literature explains a situation in a detailed manner, which children can easily grasp and ac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: ACTUAL_EXPERIENCE[1]
Message: Use simply 'facts'.
Suggestion: facts
...hilden studying films get diverted from actual facts, but consider films as entertainment on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21428571429 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8495109389 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533613445378 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 381.6 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0892307454 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.818181818 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404334154248 0.242375264174 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183806127097 0.0925447433944 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118630714456 0.071462118173 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258908626786 0.151781067708 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616944602351 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.